What type of motion should be proposed if new information is obtained about an already adopted motion that might change how members would vote?

When new information arises regarding an already adopted motion that could influence members' voting decisions, the most appropriate action is to propose a motion to reconsider. This motion allows members to revisit and potentially change their previous decision based on the newly acquired information. The framework of parliamentary procedure recognizes that circumstances can evolve, and this process ensures that members have the opportunity to deliberate again on a motion that may now have different implications.

This option is distinct in that it explicitly requires that the motion being reconsidered was previously adopted, acknowledging the authority of prior decisions while still accommodating new developments. It fosters a dynamic discussion within the organization and upholds democratic processes by ensuring all relevant information is considered.

The other options proposed do not suffice in this situation. A motion to withdraw relates to pulling back a motion before it has been adopted. A motion to table, on the other hand, is meant for temporarily setting aside a motion, not for discussing new information affecting a prior decision. A motion to amend is utilized for changing the wording or details of a pending motion rather than addressing a situation where the original motion has already been decided. Hence, a motion to reconsider is the correct course of action when new information warrants a reassessment of a previous decision.